1) I have no opinion on Mexico and I have no basis for concurring with what confluence wrote. Nothing I wrote in response to you suggested otherwise.
2) Where you have responded to what I wrote, you have written self-contradictory statements that are not strong rebuttals to the points I made. I was pointing out your use of fallacious reasoning. In your rebuttal you recommitted several of these same fallacies and added some new ones in form the self-contradiction, non sequiturs, and erecting straw men.
3) You spend a great deal of time building up this straw man of Imperialism. I have no response to this as it has nothing to do with what I wrote.
4) You end this with an ad-hominem suggesting that I and confluence read more. I point out that this is both ridiculous on its face as you know nothing about my reading habits and furthermore it is not a useful form of argument.