Your freedom to buy and carry a gun infringes on my right to feel safe in public
yes, this
That's kind of a big "unless." Good article here: http://libertarianstandard.com/2013/01/14/was-hitler-really-...
You really think that the UK, France, Canada, Australia, Sweden etc. etc. are at such a risk of tyranny from their governments that they should expose their children to more random shootings to reduce the risk?
Look at the odds of dying in a random shooting. Compare them to just about anything. Car accidents and swimming pools kill FAR more children.
"Your freedom to work out like mad and become significantly stronger than I am infringes on my right to feel safe in public."
"Your freedom to wear tattoos infringes on my right to feel safe in public."
"Your freedom to have that skin color infringes on my right to feel safe in public."
"Your freedom to choose to whom you are attracted infringes on my right to feel safe in public."
You need to define an actual danger that goes beyond feeling unsafe.
If we were discussing the legalizing of MJ, I have a feeling your attitude would abruptly change.