Now I do believe that North Korea could make great scientific and technological strides on its own. Its economy may be faltering, but I suspect their culture seeks out the very brightest people & puts them to work on very hard problems.
Now I do believe that North Korea could make great scientific and technological strides on its own. Its economy may be faltering, but I suspect their culture seeks out the very brightest people & puts them to work on very hard problems.
The US managed to become a superpower despite excluding half of their potential work force (see HN post re: IBM from yesterday) and suffering from rampant, systemic racism. The USSR became a superpower despite incredible repression
This announcement by Iran may look like a joke, but I don't think an enlightened, liberal society is a prerequisite for acquiring power.
Plus we can be assured they are making the same presentation to their own people. Remember, its far easier to stay in power when you convince your own that the bogeymen "over there" are far far worse and its the sacrifices being made by everyday citizens that keeps us all safe.
You have an economy spiraling out of control, see http://www.cato.org/blog/value-iranian-rial-hits-all-time-lo... , as an example, so expect more boasting other similar redirects. Look at how Argentina, Venezuela, and yes North Korea, all employ similar tactics.
Then shudder when you realize how our own government does the same with us and how many fall for it. People inherently want to trust their government and governments exploit that
Were you alive in the 1960s when the Soviet Union and the US were in a space race?
EDIT for a typo
http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/np5dh/iran_some_...
or kills them.
I am not saying I approve of the North Korean government (that said, I don't like most governments). But I do believe the North Koreans are better positioned to be a real threat.
| One society is a communist government, that will
| presumably accept anyone provided that they tow
| the party line
You do realize that if you fail to tow the party line your entire family gets sent to a concentration camp (even if they were all towing the party line), right?The Iranians at the end of the day are playing the 21st century version "the great game". They have strategic goals, and they aren't a 1984-style totalitarian state.
North Korea is the thing that keeps him awake at night. The combination of the capability you mention with egotistical insanity at the reigns is never a good combination.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_AHJQiMxIw
Photo of women in 1979, before Islamic Revolution:
I'm certainly no expert on the matter, but in broad strokes...
The US supported(propped up) that "free" regime of the Shah prior to 1979. They did that for cozy relations and cheap oil. That regime was actually quite brutal in its repression of dissidents (islamists mostly) and while it might look all pretty and western and "more like us" it was a brutal police state not unlike Egypt under Mubarak - which was also supported by the US.
There was a islamist revolution that took over the country in 1979 which ushered in the current situation - I'm sure the people that supported it then didn't envision it turning out the way it did but the whole thing is much more nuanced than black and white you seem to assume. And it wasn't the west trying to get oil that caused the 1979 revolution, it was a reaction AGAINST that western influence that caused the revolution.
What I'm saying is that you claimed Iran used to be a much better place before the US interfered and supported that by showing a photo from 1979. I just thought that was an odd way to support your claim since the photo is from a time when the US-supported Shah was in power. I take that as evidence that things were pretty good under the US-supported Shah.