Exactly this. Or that all theories are not worth our time, since they are just that, "just a theory" (implying there is no proof?), like creationists (of which, America is filled with) like to say.
Exactly this. Or that all theories are not worth our time, since they are just that, "just a theory" (implying there is no proof?), like creationists (of which, America is filled with) like to say.
congratulations on the beautiful ad hominem
> the idea of Americans/Zionists/Illuminati/Nibiru pulling the strings behind every major event is no doubt very exciting for conspiracy theorists
Someone is a "conspiracy theorist", so whatever he finds exciting must be wrong.
In fact, believing in creationism fundamentally relies on conspiracy theories and makes one more likely to believe in conspiracy theories.
> Someone is a "conspiracy theorist", so whatever he finds exciting must be wrong.
From a Bayesian perspective, I would get behind "much more likely", yes. I'm claiming the conspiracy theories involving those four all assume magical powers in similar ways and are just as unlikely, so I think they're OK to associate with each other, as they inform on each other.