The smoking gun was an error, but there were something like 9 Potti papers that ended up getting retracted. There's no way that someone could have accidentally made that many mistakes...
It is intentional fraud, no doubt about it; they restarted halted clinical trials. I was just pointing out they did sloppy work too.
Fundamental methodological error -> "Come on, these are competent people, you have to trust that whatever error they made didn't effect the final result."
False claim of accolade -> "How dare you fucking try to pass off this garbage as legitimate science?!?!?"