You don’t appear to have read the article, which explains the name was taken from a character in Wolfenstein, apparently in response to an alignment towards (rather pathetic) irreverence.

It doesn’t call itself anything, it doesn’t have any conception of identity, nor fur that matter the semantic meaning of either part of the portmanteau it found in its training corpus… what it does have is a bias towards the bias of its trainers, in this case paid for by someone who would find it really (if pathetically) funny if their personal LLM was automatically fascist.

It’s also got a marked bias towards generative CSAM, according to investigations and filings in multiple jurisdictions… which also implies it’s best for voters not to ask it questions.