It isn’t about valuing the final product. If you really cared about it, the code would not have stopped you doing it by hand.
In my experience, people like programming with agents because they are lazy or bad programmers (or both).
In my experience, people like programming with agents because they are lazy or bad programmers (or both).
When you get a little older, you might find that you too have more commitments and desires than you have time to complete.
(see, I can be mean too!)
I get that people really hate AI - but they're being incredibly irrational about it. Baby with the bathwater stuff. It's creepy.
Then you aren't a very good programmer, because LLMs produce worse code than the typical programmer does. They can produce more, certainly. But generating bad code faster isn't actually useful.
Well, you can. But it's cowardly.
Tell that to every successful business.
Code that exists is very frequently better than code that doesn't.
People who don't use coding agents really should stop making fools of themselves. It's painful to watch.
I'm not so sure that's true anymore.
But regardless - no one uses just one coding agent. It's a series of agents - a group to plan the work - coders to implement it - and then agents to review the work. Overall it comes out better than human code.
Here - let's test it - give me your GitHub and we can compare your code to theirs.
> Then you aren't a very good programmer
Ohh.... my sweet summer child...
May I humbly suggest you might be mistaken?
Here, let's test it. Give me some of your code (GitHub is fine) and we can compare.