[flagged]
Even your contrarianism is unoriginal.
You could sugarcoat your shit and be polite all you want with a careful choice of words, but if you don't agree 1000% with some morons they'll try to prevent everyone from seeing that there are views in opposition to theirs.
They could have fixed this if they cared.
AI models are generating the image
Pretty simple.
You know in macOS there's the Automator app that can record keyboard+mouse macros:
If I set up an automation to move my mouse just so that it copies an artist's signature from a Photoshop window and pastes it into multiple images, is that Apple's or Adobe's liability?
As some other people mentioned, AI refuses to enhance private photos if they HAPPEN TO contain Disney material etc. So clearly they don't want to step on the toes of tyrants who can hit back at a whim.
BUT if my own, personal, private photo happens to contain an t-shirt or toy or whatever of Mickey Mouse somewhere in a TINY corner of the photo, does that count as copyright infringement??
What if I'm asking AI to work on a photo of some sidewalk café that includes a person in the background reading a newspaper, with its comics section visible which exposes the signatures of several artists?
No one anywhere would say that's intentional plagiarism.
Intent matters in legality - even for suebros.