Hacker News Reader

I disagree. A meter is a reasonable approximation of most adults's step length, but a foot is not.

Everyone who works on my farm has a foot that is approximately 30cms, so it works great. If we all had 15cm feet, then we'd say you need to step off 60 feet in the aforementioned example. It is not strictly bound by the imperial system, it just so happens that the imperial system maps fairly well to what is practical in the field without any tools, so it is what we reference. I see no benefit to introducing the metric system here, despite using it in all other areas of life.

I think GP meant you wrote "step" but you are talking about "foot". Namely, you can count 90m putting your feet in front of each other 30 times.

If instead of putting your feet in front of each othr you actually take a step you should get closer to 1m.

(most people I met measure distances with 1m = 1step when playing european football, for example and you have to be at X meters from the ball por something)

A metric user would measure the same distance to "approximately 9 meters" by taking 9 large steps. This is a very common informal method of measuring distances.

It seems more practical (and certainly faster) than to measure the distance to "approximately 30 feet" by putting one foot just in front of the other 30 times.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com