I'm not sure how my ability type out a message here on a computer is hypocritical of the argument I made above. My point was that we can't yet know if these turned out to be net positive inventions for humanity, or as you said to everyone. I didn't argue they are bad or that they must be avoided, only that it Amy turn out to be a net negative in the long term.

I must assume that you don't find arguments related to climate change compelling given that they require considering scales beyond 80 years. If you are concerned with climate change I'd be very curious how you square that circle.