Well it's not a facade. It's just the factual reason. I don't even think that's a controversial point.
1. The bee hive is full of wasps, and we must be careful.
I'm saying.
2. Yes, but why are you using a crowbar to hit the beehive.
See how you can have completely factual statements and still be a bizarrely stupid idiot when it comes to responding to a factual problem?
Your framing is wrong, for example. You’re implying we are doing something wrong or provocative or that we are stirring up trouble, but the opposite is true. We are responding to provocations. If anything the what you wrote here would apply to China. Why is China hitting us with a crowbar (industrial overcapacity)? Now they’ve stirred the hornets nest.
Its like saying all you need is good intent and good things will happen.
See, a real policy frames the actions that will implement the policy.
At best, you present a soundbite. A meaningless positive intent thats all slogan and zero value.
If you have a specific question I can answer for you or something you actually want to talk about, let me know.