Those seem reasonable apart from this one:
> - releasing papers using the normal process to allow peer review
I'm not an academic but I've heard enough stories about how this can very much act as gatekeeping that I don't think it is a good request.
> - releasing papers using the normal process to allow peer review
I'm not an academic but I've heard enough stories about how this can very much act as gatekeeping that I don't think it is a good request.
No comments yet.