> If companies want to compete in the world of AI generated code, human code review has to go.

This is a HUGE non-sequitur. It only follows if by "compete" you mean producing more LoC. How often does that translate to market fit or economic success?

This is the mindset that makes me want to leave this industry immediately. Somehow, an industry that already annoyed me with how much "mediocre is good enough" was an acceptable stance, with the emergence of LLM coding tools suddenly decided that "absolute dogshit is good enough" was just as acceptable, as long as everybody else is also fine with eliminating the few quality standards they might have had.