Hacker News Reader

Comment by patcon | Hacker News Reader

but negligence is part of the system we'd have to prepare for. if the peanut gallery gets their way, the technology will be so ubiquitous that negligence will be endemic. I don't even care if they "faked" it -- they're just sneak-peaking a future ahead of its arrival date, in a way that's helping the public appreciate the implications and capabilities that have only just begun to emerge

View on HN

This. If an AI can't be deployed sandbox-free, with little to no supervision, without risking an oopsie? Then an AI oopsie is inevitable.

Practical AI deployments aren't going to do ridiculous bullshit like "airgap the server farm" or "route all inputs through a data diode". They'll give an AI root access on production servers so that it can run diagnostics live during an incident. Then they'll forget to revoke that access.

If an AI can't be trusted not to take malicious actions in pursuit of its given goals even if deployed in the most half-assed manner and given more than enough access to take those malicious actions, we have a problem. Evidently, we have a problem.

we have the tools to prevent that already: if your computer hacks someone else's, you are a criminal.

Even Jensen Huang agrees!

Given the content of his recent interview with Ezra Klein, I wonder if we're going to see Hugging Face press charges against OpenAI. When the acquisition was publicly announced, I thought that a significant reason for the acquisition was to hush them up, but now I'm not so sure.

Millions of peoples computers run malware without them knowing. I've yet to hear of one of those being prosecuted.

"Prevent"? Have you missed the part where legal liability tends to happen after the fact? If at all?

AI safety solved: driving humankind to extinction is now illegal! Skynet is outlawed! Rejoice!

yeah and the facts already happened, there are enough documented crimes to put all of them in jail.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com