Hacker News Reader

You're being presumptuous, I explicitly was explicitly thinking of a GA when I set this up, and how is it inefficient when the AI reduces the number of non-viable policies (and thus the number of wasted simulations) by multiple orders of magnitude compared to randomized policy generation?

You can reduce the amount of non viable policies without AI, for the price of electricity.

Even if you don’t, the purely randomized policies approach will still be order of magnitudes cheaper.

…what makes you think people are implementing them less efficiently? I’d be inclined to agree with you but your reply reeks of “no true Scotsman” strawman arguments that it’s hard to take it seriously.

There's a lot of information in this world. It's fun stumbling on that information sometimes. For me personally, it makes learning much easier and gradual, than reading about something from a book or LLM answers.

Someone hasn't seen xkcd 1053 recently enough