But its just PR so far. They haven't published a refereed science paper, in say Nature or Science. At this stage, its of little value to others until verified.
A better path forward is to shift from static journal articles to open, living Git (or similar revision management tool) repositories. That way everyone can file issues, add comments, submit PRs, etc. Obviously there will be some administrative challenges to block junk submitted by malicious or ignorant users but those problems are solvable.
Both of those were published in peer-reviewed journals.