Comment by dbg31415 | Hacker News Reader

Comment by dbg31415 | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

Great, can we use the data to do background checks now?

I have a suspicion that we'll find a lot of alt-right Trump-donors on the list.

Or at least can we find and shame the chicken-fuckers? Ha!

* FBI’s Kash Patel defends hiring policy change on bestiality, prostitution | Human Trafficking News | Al Jazeera // https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/9/15/fbis-kash-patel-def...

But seriously... the way things are going, I'm glad some motivated third party is backing this stuff up for the future. We're going to need all the data we can get for the next round of Nuremberg trials.

I understand that it's their bosses telling them what to do... but I'd be fully in support of a ban of anyone who had anything to do with the FBI under Trump from ever holding any sort of law-enforcement position ever again. As far as I'm concerned... they're all guilty of conspiracy to commit pedophilia, conspiracy to solicit bribery, likely hundreds of other crimes by hiding the truth from the American people. Wouldn't surprise me at all to learn they've been using all this time to destroy evidence. And I really don't care if they are "just following orders" -- anyone left in the building is in on it at this point.

"United States FBI Director Kash Patel has defended the bureau’s loosening of hiring requirements regarding prostitution and bestiality, saying the changes were meant to enable victims of those acts to apply for employment without fear of automatic disqualification."

I get he wants to hire prostitutes... but beastalised animals???

They're referring to sextortion victims. "Hey, 15 year old kid, record yourself diddling the dog or I send your whole school videos of you wanking". :(

Tbat is not what it says.

Yes it is. They want former sextortion victims to be able to join the agency. Come on.

FBI's Patel: "We did not want to punish victims of bestiality".

Bestiality != sextortion.

Patel: "they then explained to me and showed me cases in which people were forced into it and applied to the FBI and so I thought they should be considered"

He's clearly confused.

FBI made a change to their hard qualification bar to avoid excluding candidates that had been coerced into perverted crap. This is reasonable on its face: plenty of people become interested in law enforcement because they were victimized. If I were a victim of sextortion I'd want to work with law enforcement that understood what I went through.

I pointed this out. You claimed they didn't say that. I pointed out that they did say that-- now you reply that the FBI director is confused about his agency's policy in his own testimony before congress. ... because you are convinced, in spite of all reason and evidence that there is-- what?-- some pervert conspiracy?-- on the basis of what?

It seems to me that you've adopted an astonishingly unreasonable position.

> You claimed they didn't say that.

I did not.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com