Why is it OK to train on the collective IP of humanity and call it fair use but then call the next batch distilled with negative connotations?
When eg I snap a picture of my dog, that's not derived from anything. But I still get intellectual property rights for the photograph.
Aren’t they alleging these other companies directly entered into a contract and violated the terms, and in cases where question, answer pairs were obtained without such agreement, it was accomplished by outright wire fraud or theft?