> Free software licensing is an attempt to make copyright irrelevant

The creators of the GPL never said this. That's an interpretation that Richard Stallman would probably disagree with if you asked him.

> In no-copyright world, you get a copy of something and do with it as you please. No licenses, no permissions. People frequently consider this "ownership" akin to owning a physical item (you get a copy of a book, or a toaster, and you do not ask for a license to tear a page out or repaint the toaster).

I'm aware of all this. It's also irrelevant, because we live in a world with copyright, and despite the fever dreams of some, that's not changing any time soon.

Perhaps you should allow the person I was responding to answer for him/herself.