Hacker News Reader

So the material trained on has no value, but all other costs associate with ai should be captured by business? I mean we coders released it, and it’s hard to compensate everyone, but the world would be better if some open source projects got funded. They don’t even get a source footnote.

Does anyone trust Ai companies not to eventually spy on you and feed you ads? It’s not like we haven’t seen this playbook before.

View on HN

And if I share with you my story, would you share your dollar with me?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nFZP8zQ5kzk

I don't trust any company, AI or otherwise. Business is business, companies are only nice while margins are good.

I'm commenting on how things are now, not how they may turn out at some point in the future. This is in response to complains that are also mostly about now, not about hypothetical.

WRT LLMs in particular, open-weight models offset the risk a lot. As long as they track SOTA by couple months, that's the most we lose in capability should the commercial vendors start to enshittify their inference services.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com