Take the criticism and pressure off the abuser, and point it at their opponents.
This talking point keeps getting pushed around on social media and I can't help but think it's manufactured and promulgated by right wing entities.
We live in a two party system. Winning elections is important. Fielding left-wing candidates with no accomplishments makes Trump happen. It's not that complicated.
Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State and a Senator from New York, while Kamala Harris was a District Attorney and Attorney General, and then Senator for California before serving as Vice President.
Also only in the fetid delirium of Republicans and Trumpists are either of them even remotely left-wing.
The Democrats continue to insist that this isn't the case. And keep losing.
Fine. The typical American is an idiot and they get what they deserve, then.
>The Democrats continue to insist that this isn't the case. And keep losing.
It shouldn't be the case, the Democrats are correct (at least about that, although I suspect they never actually "insisted" on anything of the sort,) Kamala Harris and Hillary Clinton were more qualified than Trump and deserved to win, and I hope this whole clownshow of a country burns to the ground.
I leave the floor to you, matchbok3. I've exposed myself to Hacker News for too long and I need time in the screaming box.
How do you justify that statement at all? Especially when you can point to Trump as a candidate with no experience who won.
Not really sure what you are arguing. The polls all showed this.
I mentioned two people the same as you, differentiate between them please
> was perceived by middle America as a left-wing candidate coming from a left-wing state.
Thank you for explaining one half of your statement, how do you explain the “no accomplishments” part of your statement?
If you are going to rely on polls again then I’ll ask in advance how reality matters at all and it isn’t just down to vibes?