They are destroying others' property, which is as immoral as it gets.
The basics: Do not kill, do not steal, do not destroy.
This is behavior worse than that of rabid animals. It should be treated accordingly.
The basics: Do not kill, do not steal, do not destroy.
This is behavior worse than that of rabid animals. It should be treated accordingly.
How would you feel if they put cameras in your home? I know it sounds absurd but in some places landlord CCTV is gaining more and more terrain.
These individuals destroying cameras, instead of using force to try and impose their will (to no avail), should support candidates that favor the policies they want.
We (supposedly) live in a society. Society is not possible if crime is tolerated.
I'd rather we just elect better city councils.
To be honest, we have far to many people who will put up with anything that doesn't affect them personally. They are capable of much greater harm than this bunch of guys with tube cutters.
> Society is not possible if crime is tolerated.
That goes for everyone!
> Law enforcement officers across the United States have repeatedly abused Flock Safety automated license plate reader (ALPR) camera databases to stalk, track, and harass romantic partners, ex-partners, and citizens for personal reasons.
Only the state has the means to do so. The state holds the monopoly on violence.
>Law enforcement officers across the United States have repeatedly abused
Ever since body cameras, whole ACAB claim has fallen apart. There definitely are bad actors, but they are few and far between.
I think the problem is that I haven't fully recovered from this Dinosaurs episode:
I can easily think of a ton of things that are far more immoral than that.
> This is behavior worse than that of rabid animals. It should be treated accordingly.
Somehow, I can't agree that some relatively mild property damage should be penalized by death.