I wrote the article. I am not interested in "style suggestions" from the LLM; I'm interested in things I can verify for myself. Is this word or construction overused in the piece? Is there a pointless throat-clearing like "it's important to note that" crudding up this paragraph? Am I overusing vacuous nouns like "issue" ("the big issue is that") or "factor" ("the next factor to consider is")? Do I have my verbs buried in nouns, like "distortion" where I should just use "distort"?

I don't care whether the LLM likes these constructions or not. I don't like them. I usually don't want to keep them in my work. It's my call what to change; I just want issues flagged.

Your prompts would be different. Or, they would if you decided that having an LLM merely point things out about your own writing wasn't itself a form of contamination. You do you!

I wrote this article in about 45 minutes and didn't workshop it with anybody else, so I'm not surprised it's gone over people's heads; it was just something I was talking about on Twitter that I wanted to get down on a page. But it's pretty obvious that a lot of people here have missed the point.