> better code than a human would write,
Why would that be the case? You can run human written code through the same “linters, compilers, static analysis, fuzzing, testing” as you do agent produced code.
Why would that be the case? You can run human written code through the same “linters, compilers, static analysis, fuzzing, testing” as you do agent produced code.
Agents can also do all of those things, but they are generally more compliant to instruction.
Agents require far stricter guardrails than humans. Without linters, tests, static analysis, oracles etc… no agent can create a large program.
Even if you’re correct, you just build those checks into CI so that neither humans nor agents can skip them.