"Name a free ID for voting that's not this free ID for voting, nor the free IDs for the homeless."
LOL! You made my point for me in your own comment. Thanks?
>This is not an ID card, so you’re incorrect.
This is a acceptable ID for voting in Massachusetts and is free to obtain. QED.
Because you were so blinded by being proven wrong, you misread my OP and poorly straw manned. I am correct.
Your original post, in its entirety, was:
> Every state in the US has free ID cards that work for voting.
Massachusetts does not have a free ID card. QED, LOL, etc.
If you'd like to retract your statement and reword it to something like "Every state in the US has a free method or process to prove one's identity that works for voting" then I'd be much more inclined to agree with you (though I'm still not sure of this either). But not every state in the US has a free ID *card*.
This is a meaningful distinction because non-ID-card-based identity verification processes like in Massachusetts often need to be repeated for every election, creating more work for the voter, preventing mail-in or at-home voting, and leading to less voter turnout.
Can't have any wrongthink now can we?
>mostly re-post your dead post from a couple days ago, which I already read and dismissed as incorrect.
"I dismissed it because you called me out and proved me wrong."
>Massachusetts does not have a free ID card
You left off "for voting". Massachusetts does have a free ID card for voting. QED, LOL, etc.
>If you'd like to retract your statement and reword it to something like
My statement is fact, yours is false. If you'd like to retract your statement and reword it to something like "yes I was wrong, Massachusetts does have a free ID for voting" then I'd agree with you.
>But not every state in the US has a free ID card.
Every state in the US has free ID card for voting. I did not claim there was free general ID.
>This is a meaningful distinction
You're poor reading comprehension does not make this a meaningful distinction. QED.