so someone with more money should have more influence over an election? you really agree with this?
Strange how you substituted "a corporation" for "the person in charge of spending in a corporation", those aren't the same.
That was deliberate, because a corporation makes no spending decisions, ever. All decisions are made by people inside the corporation with the proper responsibility.
That is a major part of the reasoning for the Supreme Court rulings on the matter of corporate political funding.
Legally, the corporation itself makes the decision and is responsible for the consequences.