Hacker News Reader

You’re mistaking what is evident from what is philosophically knowable.

It isn’t knowable to you that I am conscious.

However, it is evident.

It is not evident.

It is evident you are murderer.

Would you be okay with this statement being evident? Why or why not?

I’m not interested in having conversations with people who are bad-faith, deliberately or indiliberately obtuse or otherwise non-responsive to logic.

You're the one that started bad faith by claiming some things as beyond logic.

I made an argument of inference that underpins all philosophy.

You made an argument to solipsism, which historically means you aren't worth discussing philosophy with.

I made the opposite of solipsism. I am asking you to show your receipts.