Fine, let's be more clear: reusable rocket boosters that land themselves.
Experts said it wouldn't work. Then they said okay maybe it works, but the economics won't. Now they say nothing.
Experts said it wouldn't work. Then they said okay maybe it works, but the economics won't. Now they say nothing.
It's 1990s technology.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_DC-X?useskin...
No one denies that SpaceX has done good work. But claiming that they have done anything others considered impossible is just wrong. The basic principles had been demonstrated decades before.
You are correct that people criticized the economics. Seeing as SpaceX's prospectus shows their rocketry business loses money, I am not convinced they're winning that argument.
> but if you are talking about something reusable that takes off and lands vertically
No, I am talking about something that takes off and lands vertically after boosting a first stage to orbit.
Suborbital is 100x easier.