>FA and CA lied to users
Where's the lie?
>If that was the advice, it seems pretty terrible.
If you read either my comment or the email, you'd know what the advice was.
Where's the lie?
>If that was the advice, it seems pretty terrible.
If you read either my comment or the email, you'd know what the advice was.
"Cambridge Analytica then arranged an informed consent process for research in which several hundred thousand Facebook users would agree to complete a survey for payment that was only for academic use.[15][17] However, Facebook allowed this app not only to collect personal information from survey respondents but also from respondents' Facebook friends.[15] In this way, Cambridge Analytica acquired data from millions of Facebook users.[15]"
CA acquired access to the data of ~90 million users from the actions of several thousand other users whom they paid to fill out forms that stated they were for non-political use.
FB said data was private that they then shared with CA without user consent.
This was widely reported on, and people admitted to these behaviors. I am not sure an internal email is enough to rewrite history.
> If you read either my comment or the email, you'd know what the advice was.
I read both of these, and many of your recent comments seem to be some form of directed motivated reasoning or trolling, not sure.