[flagged]
How dared I to imply that some LLM output is more deterministic than the other, your LLM majesty. Shame on me and my entire family! For generations to come!
So sorry I implied that the code that doesn't work and has to be fixed later is deterministic in its execution and can be reused later instead of being re-generated from scratch!
Will I ever wash it off my name, your grace?
Anyway you are wrong, the tool calls are deterministic, generating a one-shot script isn't.
Calling scripts wins long term. Maybe you haven't had a chance to work with agents for months on the same task and observing them getting looped. That is your ignorance talking.
Why am I even discussing it with people who don't understand basic costs of time and money, ffs.
I wonder, is it easier to modify a script that agent wrote before to satisfy your prompt, or is it easier to write a new one from scratch each time a retry happens?
Are input tokens more expensive than output tokens?
Or, maybe your prompts are not good enough. And it's not my problem to fix, as you claim you are very experienced.
Vibe coders like you who don't even understand basic fundamentals are pretty infuriating because you don't even understand what everyone else is talking about
Talking about basic fundamentals yet not understanding how LLMs work, that is very rich coming from you.
Go back to your subreddit bubble. Maybe you can vide code something useful at this point.
I believe you are one of your so called vibe-coders. Who just think they know something but in fact they have an inflated ego.
That will pass with time, once you get more experience around people, I hope. Or now, and then you'll become one of those edgy bullshitters.
And I'm so sorry that I'm allegedly distilling openai and claude models for the sake of deepseek in china, while being an US citizen. You must be feeling very butthurt about it. And that's what keeps my night sleep sound. I wish I could taste your tears.