Is reductio ad absurdum the only argument pro AI crowd can come up with?
Like, why not stick to those products of civilization that don't actively try to replace humans who just so happen to comprise this very civilization?
Like, why not stick to those products of civilization that don't actively try to replace humans who just so happen to comprise this very civilization?
Technology has been augmenting or replacing human work for as long as the first slab of rock was shoved up an inclined plane (wedge) and popped into its spot in the Great Pyramid.