No, I'm not disagreeing based on vibes. I'm disagreeing based on my deep understanding of business and economics.

You're assuming you already know what my objections are and defending against them, when I haven't even said anything specific. Now _that_ is anti-intellectual.

The research isn't clear. It's near impossible to model the effect of UBI on the population at large by running a study with N people who know they're going back to normal at the end of the study.

Many have attempted to "give people money" before. It has invariably failed and resulted in inflation.