I feel so angry with and ashamed of my own country in a way I cannot even find words for.
I feel so angry and ashamed for what the EU bureaucrats and politicians have done to the EU.
Many people do feel like me. I'm not german but I know that half of that region didn't suddenly wake up "neo-nazis": they're people who are fed up with what the politicians have done to their countries.
You cannot change abruptly systems / countries / cultures by flooding them massively with migrants from different cultures by the tens of millions and expect the entirety of the population to, like you, beg for more.
Some people have never changed, only hidden, and now they're coming out. They've been trying since day one, but enough of the people who remember the bad old days are dead, and everyone needs to relearn the cyclical lesson once again. Usually it doesn't take a major war, hopefully this time won't either.
Tell us what has changed abruptly. Concrete examples.
And if things have changed so much, why do they seem stuck in the 1930s?
>they're people who are fed up with what the politicians have done to their countries.
And that is why they vote for billionaires to get the right to punch poor and different people. And to shout "Sieg! Heil!" at meetings.
Oh, sorry, they shout "Sieg! Mund!". Totally different /s
>half of that region didn't suddenly wake up "neo-nazis"
Funny how they still have the same chants and slogans.
Remind me the score of the AfD today?
Undemocratically outlawing the opposition to secure the vote...
>Remind me the score of the AfD today?
Remind me of party that is calling to undemocratically outlaw the opposition to secure the vote?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/germanys-social-democrats-back-pr...
You are cute in thinking your argument holds, but they were not that far (33, 37%) without outlawing the opposition - which were communists directed by Stalin. You profess your hate of the left in all your other posts; if you were in 1933, would you really mind?
>Remind me of party that is calling to undemocratically outlaw the opposition to secure the vote?
The law that would allow to ban the AfD is there since 1949. Reflect why. And also reflect why Germany is a constitutional democracy and not just a democracy.
Your quote from above specifically calls it "the last free election" whereas any history book will tell, and you just admitted, that isn't true. You're contradicting yourself. The elections in 1933 were not by any means "free democratic elections."
>which were communists directed by Stalin.
And many members of the SPD, trade unionist, etc.
>You profess your hate of the left in all your other posts; if you were in 1933, would you really mind?
I would have been attacked by the Nazis and sent to a camp.
>The law that would allow to ban the AfD is there since 1949. Reflect why.
Germans poorly thought they could ban "fringe" groups like Marxist and neo-Nazi to stay a democracy. The AfD is not a fringe group, they just won a plurality in a free election. Reflect on why you want to ban a party that was just elected democratically without violence in a free election.
>And also reflect why Germany is a constitutional democracy and not just a democracy.
A constitutional democracy is a democracy.
They legally won a plurality in the Bundestag, which is sufficient for Hitler to be legally appointed chancellor, which made everything that follows legal. Like it or not, the Nazi regime was a legal result of democracy. Democracy, neither then nor now, requires an absolute majority, which is why so many European governments are formed as coalitions.
AfD did not win a majority in Saxony-Anhalt either. Nevertheless, a person can justifiably feel disappointed by the democratic outcome, both then and now, without being dismissive of democracy itself.
> You're following me around in the comments
I am doing my part to eliminate misinformation and stupidity in the world. You're welcome.
No they didn't. The elections in 1933 were not by any means "free democratic elections." The election was far from fair and legal. It was carried out in an atmosphere of intimidation and illegal violence against political opponents.
>Like it or not, the Nazi regime was a legal result of democracy.
Wrong, this is false. They undemocratically jailed and then outlawed the opposition to secure the vote.
>Democracy, neither then nor now, requires an absolute majority, which is why so many European governments are formed as coalitions.
No one made this claim.
>AfD did not win a majority in Saxony-Anhalt either. Nevertheless, a person can justifiably feel disappointed by the democratic outcome, both then and now, without being dismissive of democracy itself.
The opposition parties and opponents are being dismissive of democracy itself. They're fascistically attempting to ban the AfD... banning the opposition to secue the vote, like the Nazis.
>I am doing my part to eliminate misinformation and stupidity in the world.
The best way for you to do that would be to stop posting. Thanks.
Besser kann ich's nicht unter schonender Schutzatmosphäre verpacken.
Is Russia going the have Soviets 2.0 where this time the Orthodox Church is part of the administration and Germany will be Nazi Germany 2.0 but this time Jews and Homosexuals are welcome?
But speaking of it, Putin was stationed as a KGB officer in saxony in the cold war(allegedly being responsible for radical west german left terrorists) and speaks german. I surely noticed lot's of russian propaganda channels. They became a big thing during Corona and became obvious russian (at least to some), when the channels that propagated antivaxx before suddenly reported anti Ukrainian propaganda and also openly support for the russian aggression.