They didn't do a great job of nation building afterwards, but the actual war part was very successful.
They didn't do a great job of nation building afterwards, but the actual war part was very successful.
The strategic outcome in both wars was to replace the goverment for a friendlier one, and in both cases the USA didn't get it, not even close.
But if you view wars as an sport where people kills other people and the winner is the one who kills better/more, then war is declared over and "teams" look for another war to "play", indeed USA won both wars in a walk.
The current Iraqi government is considerably more friendly to the US.
Gulf War, it was a walk in the park. Second Iraq War, not so much, and you can't barely say US won anything.
You might make a case for increased control of and importance in the middle east for Iraq, sure - that declined somewhat after a forced fumbling backwards out of Afghanistan and tanked on contact with Iran, so if that was the take home stuffed panda prize to write home about it's been well and truly run over by a road train and left in a ditch.
Clearly big wins for the USofA PMCs, but that's a little more narrow than "America".