Hacker News Reader

Comment by ivan_gammel | Hacker News Reader

Consensus among whom? AI is a tool, that can be used differently and AI art is well-recognized, admired and exhibited the same way as any other art forms.

Is someone selling their impressionist paintings today on a fair more an artist than someone who has put equivalent or more effort in creating prompts, references, final renders, image curation and postprocessing etc? The latter may at least have more audience.

View on HN

>AI art is well-recognized

I disagree with this assertion. I don't think it's at all well-recognized, and in fact derided and shunned by the general public.

> Is someone selling their impressionist paintings today on a fair more an artist than someone who has put equivalent or more effort in creating prompts, references, final renders, image curation and postprocessing etc?

Emphatically, yes. Considering the latter is not an artist at all.

By that logic collages and photography aren't art. Composition of human ideas regardless of the tool or medium is itself art.

Please review the above comments. I have not made a single statement that leads to exluding either of those. My comments did not seek to define art, or the artistic process, only to exclude a specific category of media.

Well, that‘s your subjective opinion. In 1860s people like you rejected impressionism.

Meanwhile:

https://www.art-magazine.ai/program

note some nice venues in the list.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com