[flagged]
> Absentee voting is great. You request – I'm an absentee voter because I requested, I got, and then I sent in my vote. So that works out very well. That's what we've had. But now they want to send in millions and millions of ballots.
> Absentee Ballots are fine because you have to go through a precise process to get your voting privilege. Not so with Mail-Ins.
> Absentee Ballots are fine. A person has to go through a process to get and use them. Mail-In Voting, on the other hand, will lead to the most corrupt Election is USA history. Bad things happen with Mail-Ins.
> Absentee good, universal mail-in very bad
Texas just announced they are going to shut down more polling locations in the upcoming election. I wonder if it will happen to be in a Democrat concentrated region.
Unless the absentee process is guaranteed to be frictionless, it is inviting more rat fuckery.
I think you’re giving too much credence to someone whose argument was disingenuous. It was never about the security of elections, it was about people using mail-in ballots to not vote for him.
We may never know, every single time I see or hear this comment there is never any data/proof to back it up.
Remember: nothing was wrong with how we vote in 2016 and this suddenly became an issue in 2020.
Actual, intentional rampant fraud has not been documented.
You compare the signature with what's on the voter record. You check records to see if they passed away recently. Then you can compare addresses and any other personal details. This is more than enough information to strongly verify that the person who voted was who they say.
It's why fraud is rare and why the cases of attempted mass voting fraud are immediately identified (see: Leslie McCrae Dowless)