If, say, you have tons of torrents seeding all the time, and you don't download very often, how is that hard to believe?
If, say, you have tons of torrents seeding all the time, and you don't download very often, how is that hard to believe?
It makes no sense to me since bandwidth is so cheap compared to 20+ years ago and I think the incentives should instead encourage variety and availability like a distributed, highly-available, P2P archive.
Which is exactly what it is like for many trackers these days. They have an "economy" where some type of bonus point system allows you to buy upload credits. You often acquire this by either simply seeding over time, or by uploading special torrents with rewards, eg double upload credits, etc.
Some trackers even double down on this concept and basically only care about long term seeding. Ratio doesn't matter as much if you're seeding 24/7.
The other way that requires more storage and longer term commitment is just to seed everything you download forever, including things that you grab on freeleech events or with tokens (A "bonus" given out on Red that you can redeem for a free download).