Hacker News Reader

> Isn't this just a proof that there are many unnamed things, but no unnameable ones?

Where is it a proof that there are many unnamed things ? I could only see it as an argument that there are no "unnameable" things.

View on HN

It depends how you define "named", but for example, not all the grain of sands you see on a beach are named (yes, they are named collectively, but not individually. If "collectively" is valid, then that's further proof that "unnameable" things can't exist, because they already have a collective name).

Reply on news.ycombinator.com