If you can't name it you can still describe it.

But then by describing it you are committing it to a set of conditions this unnameable thing satisfies.

But then if you go beyond a narrow interpretation of that paradox and accept that naming and describing are both accomplishing the same fundamental thing, that being committing a thing to a condition (like a name) or set of conditions (like a description), you do run into the same problem.

Hmm, interesting. Now back to this E2E testing stuff I've been avoiding.