This problem is easily solved. "Check that the blog looks the same in XYZ browsers".
I have LLMs align stuff for me all the time because I'm too lazy. It takes the screenshot, changes the code, code auto reloads and boom, done.
I have LLMs align stuff for me all the time because I'm too lazy. It takes the screenshot, changes the code, code auto reloads and boom, done.
If everyone is doing the job of hundreds, extremely productive and everything is so easily fixed, why everything feels so slow and broken, even so basic things? That's kind of the point. I'd expect nearly perfect websites everywhere, especially from "productivity" people who mastered the flow.
This doesn't make sense. There were slow and broken things before AI. This was true even when the things were made by hundreds or thousands of engineers.
If an organization doesn't care about making their app or site fast or correct, then unless they have a truly ludicrous amount of free manpower (more than is available now with AI, because review and architecture are still bottlenecks), it probably won't happen.
AI doesn't change this. AI doesn't change the priorities of an organization, it just changes how quickly and cheaply they can build. And every org has a point in their priority queue where things are no longer worth it to spend resources on.
If Venmo didn't care about making their login page work well with Firefox (which, in my experience, they don't) before AI, why would you expect it to be better with AI?
Where it would take 6 hours to make a first cut of a static site, you can now do that in 15 minutes. Obviously that's not going to be perfect.
Excellent feedback, Thank you.