You'll find that those goalposts are very movable.

You could probably score 100% on ARC 3 if you were motivated enough. I find some of the current problems to be kind of like Chess - mechanically simple, and ~solvable, but it's difficult to force myself to think at length about a monotonous and meaningless problem. The machines do have an advantage on the "energy" front; they've become almost psychotically persistent (and don't get tired after too many prompts).

Anyway yes I think we've had AGI for a while now, even if the GI doesn't quite match up with what we expect from a human.

>A 100% score means AI agents can beat every game as efficiently as humans. (0)

Yey, AGI is finally solved.

(0) https://arcprize.org/arc-agi/3

> Is this AGI? I don't think I can score 100% on ARC AGI.

100% is some "RHAE" metric: its performance of median human first time seeing those problem.

It is until ARC-AGI-4. Maybe around 73 we will stop.

Yes, we’ve had AGI for years now.

Depends on which definition they’ll use today.

agi with a context of 250k-1mill tokens?

Could KITT? Cmdr. Data?

What's AGI, at the end of the day? Equivalence to the average human?