Hacker News Reader

> But I still strongly believe the project makes a lot of sense, and I genuinely think these issues can be solved by 2028, if the project keeps its focus on stability instead of another SDK for SQL, web sockets, image compression, or whatever comes next

If you check the maintainer X, he's asking Claude for what features to implement next. Not only stabilizing isn't the priority, even the features implemented are random.

View on HN

> If you check the maintainer X, he's asking Claude for what features to implement next.

Link?

> Link?

https://xcancel.com/jarredsumner/status/2089183223024943505

Thanks. Seems pretty innocent to me.

What does innocent even mean in this context? I don't care if it's innocent. It is. Naivy too. But millions of people use the system and were expecting stability, not it to be a random AI experiment.

> If you check the maintainer X, he's asking Claude for what features to implement next. Not only stabilizing isn't the priority, even the features implemented are random.

To me that sort of stunt sounds like blatant attempts to distract the audience away from relevant topics.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com