Hacker News Reader

Comment by Anon1096 | Hacker News Reader

Note: if your reason for switching is purely uptime, you will be sorely disappointed with codeberg

Their own site reports the 2 week uptime at 1 nine https://status.codeberg.org/status/codeberg and I suspect if you use the (really terrible) across-all-product-offerings uptime methodology that people love to post for github it would be a 0 nines overall service.

View on HN

> Their own site reports the 2 week uptime at 1 nine

If you look at github's uptime for that past 24 hours they're way below 1 nine.

In all seriousness, the amount of time you amortize over matters - if you look at the status account here https://social.anoxinon.de/@codebergstatus the downtime is not bad overall even though recently it was rough.

The link you provided has shown a nearly perfect uptime. Your statement doesn't reflect the proof.

Personally I have never had a single issue with Codeberg's uptime. Are you trying to argue that GitHub's is better for some reason (when it objectively is not)?

The link provided shows "Uptime (336 hours): 98.76%". That's one nine of uptime for fourteen days.

The reason for switching was shoving all the slop down my throat, even when just browsing. There are a couple of things I have published and a handful of others I plan on open sourcing some day so for the purpose, codeberg does a brilliant job. For work - meh i'm in a corporate environment running internal repositories on company servers so that's less of an issue still.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com