>Setting aside the debates about model quality, etc., surely we can all agree that predictions are not evidence?
Predictions are warnings. When we have the evidence it will be too late. So let me ask you, what direction are we headed?
>Setting aside the debates about model quality, etc., surely we can all agree that predictions are not evidence?
Predictions are warnings. When we have the evidence it will be too late. So let me ask you, what direction are we headed?
Figure 11-9:
https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/figures/chapter-11/figure...
Figure 11-2:
https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/figures/chapter-11/figure...
Chapter 11:
Thanks.
Crazy that you think even these graphs, which do not include the last six years, are just fine.
Climate change is not just about it getting warmer. The problem also lies with changes in climate, the pattern of weather. Sudden changes in climate do not allow for adaptation to compensate. This includes human adaptation.
But it may be better just to read the IPCC summary:
https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/chapter/summary-for-polic...
They said nothing of the kind. So your opening sentence immediately indicates you aren’t here to discuss this in good faith.
Did I say those words?
This is the latest assessment report, AR6, published 2021-2023. It's the latest IPCC data available. The next one won't come out until after 2029.
The fact that you don't understand this indicates that you don't really know the details of what you're talking about.