Why not TigerVNC?
> TigerVNC was originally based on the (never-released) VNC 4 branch of TightVNC.
It seems to be popular, that’s why I’m asking.
> TigerVNC was originally based on the (never-released) VNC 4 branch of TightVNC.
It seems to be popular, that’s why I’m asking.
Funny thing is that the document where they'd explain their reasoning to fork TightVNC returns 404.