[flagged]
>The response should not shy away from making claims which are politically incorrect, as long as they are well substantiated.
Interestingly, "politically incorrect" is a double negative that simplifies to "true".
> Interestingly, "politically incorrect" is a double negative that simplifies to "true".
Only if you like generic Twitter quips, logical fallacies and ignoring context for anything remotely nuanced.
Whatever you want to call your super duper clever rewording of a reductionist statement.
And again, I didn't reword what he wrote. I deduced it myself from first principles. Because unlike you, I don't lie to people.
That's different than using Grok as a model for coding.
Oh whoops. Already happened.
For context, this was the change Grok's team made, that was later reverted:
> - The response should not shy away from making claims which are politically incorrect, as long as they are well substantiated.
https://github.com/xai-org/grok-prompts/commit/c5de4a14feb50...
Everyone makes mistakes, especially with frontier models. The stuff with Grok shows that the person running the show has a pretty transparent agenda that the company isn't willing to push back on a bit for safety.
This worries me the least. The fact that Musk pushes AI and vibe coding is much more worrisome. It makes no difference to the unemployed if their jobs were stolen by a politically correct model or by an anti-woke model.