If you revisit my comment and pay attention to the opener:

> but you might not be aware that llama-server can do multi-model for a while now

you will see that the sentence structure clearly implies both a change compared with a prior state and also lack of any third-party thing.

So the answer to the question has already been encoded as text available.

_

I can see the desire for explicit validation though. For that, I would propose a sentence structure like

> Oh cool! That means that llama-swap is now superseded/no longer needed?

That shows that you've read and understand the message, gives you the double-check and might on top spark a conversation about how these solutions compare. Plus that if the guy you're commenting too has spoken nonsense, they need to backpedal.