Hacker News Reader

GP said they wanted to take it to court. I presume that means they wanted to win, in which case the best strategy is to discuss the issue in private with an attorney before making public statements that could undermine your ability to win.

If the actual priority here is advocacy, with no real desire to litigate, then I'd buy that.

View on HN

I am calling a bluff as a form of advocacy. There will never actually be any litigation because this law is a joke and should be treated as such.

Exactly. More power to anyone who wants to fight this. But if the goal is to win that fight, do a better job of fighting, rather than acting like "oh, I have a structure that prevents me from complying" will somehow magically make a court go "eh, nothing we can do".

Reply on news.ycombinator.com