The degree to which you can discern is the degree to which you can meaningfully ask for human vs AI.
Art consists of decisions made by the artist that are interpretable by the audience. Automatically generated imagery lacks this, but still presents a fascimille of it. The intention and thoughtfulness of the artist is encoded within their creation, and when there is no artist this is lost.
You can't win this argument. Your comments probably require prior exposure to art to understand.
And the degree which this is discerned... sometimes AI art wins contests.
Do you understand how that addresses none of what I talked about?
It is a direct refutation.
Art is not a contest, and the lie is not one of quality
ai art usage isn't a binary black or white thing as most imply