Hacker News Reader

It is nice to have a model that can "do it all", though. And surely that's still the end goal? Like how MoE is still somewhat popular in certain areas even after its heyday.

I am wondering if models will end up being some sort of evolution of MoE where it has something internally like the model the author refers to that gets surfaced when it needs to search in some way. I guess it makes sense; our own brains have so many distinct task-specific regions.

View on HN

Yes, agreed, but I think it’s going to be difficult to have a high quality model that “does it all” and have it be local. For a quality “does it all” model, you’re going to need a lot of parameters and that means you’re almost always going to be running in the cloud. But it seems like you could probably get a smaller, focused model that runs locally and is also high quality. In other words, I want the programming expert portion of a 2T model that is maybe 35B or 70B parameters or whatever but it’s running locally (and yes, I know you don’t just carve out an expert from a larger model, but conceptually that’s what I’m after).

Yeah, I always thought the future of this stuff would be hot-pluggable MoE modules or LORAs that are able to be downloaded and applied/used at will like how skills have become a thing.

Like, atm most architectures seem limited by a single context and fixed architecture with no hot loading. Especially for robotics, being able to load/unload various specialised skills on limited mobile hardware will (I hope) definitely become a thing.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com